To cut to the chase on a clinical survey about consumer perceptions of ads on mobile phones, let\u2019s just say that full-page interstitials are not well liked. Mobile video advertising platform Receptiv discovered this when it used 62 people as test subjects in conjunction with neuroscientists and Toronto company True Impact.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe were curious about how people actually behave when they are presented by an ad experience,\u201d Receptiv<\/a> President & Global CRO Richard Kosinski says in this interview with Beet.TV at the Digital Content NewFronts<\/a>.<\/p>\n That curiosity was sated by equipping the test subjects\u2014who thought they were testing a new software app\u2014with brain activity scanners and eye-tracking glasses. During the test, the participants were shown full-page, interstitial video ads and embedded, opt-in video ad units.<\/p>\n \u201cPeople find full-page, interstitial units to be annoying, interruptive and disruptive to their experience,\u201d Kosinksi explains. \u201cThey don\u2019t like them. They use negative feedback.\u201d<\/p>\n When they experienced the embedded, opt-in video ad units, \u201cThey found those to be joyful, helpful. They were generally positive.\u201d<\/p>\n